Sunday, February 8, 2009

Unless you're part of the Obamanation, there are few things more sacred to Americans than the Constitution. Look who's defying it now. Nothing is sacred when the Obamatrons are concerned!!!

from Over the Hill Oracles:

The answer to the census question may be decided by the Supreme Court, but watch Obama’s clandestine maneuvers to assign “responsibility” for the census from the Secretary of Commerce to the White House.


Here’s the law:


The Congress, by law directed that:



“The Secretary [of Commerce] shall perform the functions and duties imposed upon him by this title, may issue such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out such functions and duties, and may delegate the performance of such functions and duties and the authority to issue such rules and regulations to such officers and employees of the Department of Commerce as he may designate.”


Credit those folks over at Samizdata ….



As I read it, the Director of the Census must, by law, be within the Department of Commerce and under the direction of the (Senate approved) Secretary of Commerce who then reports to the president. Am I missing something?
Correction: From reading through Title 13, Chapter 1 it appears obvious to me that the POTUS has no role in the census whatsoever beyond, with Senate approval, selecting the Secretary of Commerce and, also with Senate approval, selecting the Director of the Census who shall perform such duties as may be imposed upon him by law, regulations, or orders of the Secretary.” Hhmmm… No president mentioned.


The Secretary of Commerce is the only authority the law recognizes. Since as commenter Laird points out, the Constitution did not place the census function in Article II - the Executive branch but in Article I - the Legislative branch, it is not at all within the President’s reach unless the legislature places it there.


And watch for Obama to still try and put ACORN in charge of the census ….


Any question about WHY there are so many Obama-watch sites on the web???


More blurbs from the blogs:


– Stimulus Plan (Porkarama) updates are here ….


Biden: Ignore the voters


HERE’S a good question: why doesn’t Obama tell us specifically HOW this money will resolve his “now or never” crisis? We won’t see any jobs outta this political payback package for years.


– Obama has again voted “present” on this bogus stimulus plan. How to hype a crisis in two steps …. So where exactly is the change we (?) hoped for??? Forget it. It’s the same ole way with a Chicago twist ….


– BREAKING: Obama tells Gates to “stand down” on the troop surge in Afghanistan …..


Is he looking for ‘out‘ in Afghanistan???


– World opinion on Obama is fading ….


From London to America: What have you done?


Pakistan to the US: Show us the money!!!


Russia forms Alliance with six central Asian nations: Take THAT, America.


Ecuador expels US Embassy official: South America rejects the “Chicago way” …


USS Cole mom is disgusted with Obama …. article and video


Pending: More and more parents and (retired) naval personnel are speaking out about the way the killers of their loved ones are being released ….


more pending …..


.


ACORN to do census? Out of Afghanistan???

from Over the Hill Oracles:



The answer to the census question may be decided by the Supreme Court, but watch Obama’s clandestine maneuvers to assign “responsibility” for the census from the Secretary of Commerce to the White House.


Here’s the law:


The Congress, by law directed that:



“The Secretary [of Commerce] shall perform the functions and duties imposed upon him by this title, may issue such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out such functions and duties, and may delegate the performance of such functions and duties and the authority to issue such rules and regulations to such officers and employees of the Department of Commerce as he may designate.”


Credit those folks over at Samizdata ….



As I read it, the Director of the Census must, by law, be within the Department of Commerce and under the direction of the (Senate approved) Secretary of Commerce who then reports to the president. Am I missing something?
Correction: From reading through Title 13, Chapter 1 it appears obvious to me that the POTUS has no role in the census whatsoever beyond, with Senate approval, selecting the Secretary of Commerce and, also with Senate approval, selecting the Director of the Census who shall perform such duties as may be imposed upon him by law, regulations, or orders of the Secretary.” Hhmmm… No president mentioned.


The Secretary of Commerce is the only authority the law recognizes. Since as commenter Laird points out, the Constitution did not place the census function in Article II - the Executive branch but in Article I - the Legislative branch, it is not at all within the President’s reach unless the legislature places it there.


And watch for Obama to still try and put ACORN in charge of the census ….


Any question about WHY there are so many Obama-watch sites on the web???


More blurbs from the blogs:


– Stimulus Plan (Porkarama) updates are here ….


Biden: Ignore the voters


HERE’S a good question: why doesn’t Obama tell us specifically HOW this money will resolve his “now or never” crisis? We won’t see any jobs outta this political payback package for years.


– Obama has again voted “present” on this bogus stimulus plan. How to hype a crisis in two steps …. So where exactly is the change we (?) hoped for??? Forget it. It’s the same ole way with a Chicago twist ….


– BREAKING: Obama tells Gates to “stand down” on the troop surge in Afghanistan …..


Is he looking for ‘out‘ in Afghanistan???


– World opinion on Obama is fading ….


From London to America: What have you done?


Pakistan to the US: Show us the money!!!


Russia forms Alliance with six central Asian nations: Take THAT, America.


Ecuador expels US Embassy official: South America rejects the “Chicago way” …


USS Cole mom is disgusted with Obama …. article and video


Pending: More and more parents and (retired) naval personnel are speaking out about the way the killers of their loved ones are being released ….


more pending …..


.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Obama's character SHOULD count --

Character, integrity and credibility are relevant in a leader. Especially in a person who aspires to the highest office in the world.

Charles Krauthammer agrees.



Thursday, September 11, 2008

Obama: 9/11 was "a failure of empathy"

Eight days after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, Obama -- the man who would be Commander in Chief -- blamed the terrorist attacks on "a failure of empathy."



The July 20 issue of the New Yorker magazine got a lot of attention for its cover, which carried a "satirical" cartoon depicting Michelle and Barack Obama that Obama supporters found tasteless and offensive. Buried inside that issue's feature story, however, was a reaction by Obama to 9/11 that all voters should find even more tasteless and offensive.


The article reprised a piece published in Chicago's Hyde Park Herald on Sept. 19, 2001, and written by a then-unknown and otherwise undistinguished state senator from Illinois. The senator, a former community organizer, wrote that after tightening security at our airports and repairing our intelligence networks, we "must also engage . . . in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness."


According to Barack Obama, the madness that drove terrorists to turn passenger jets into manned cruise missiles aimed at our centers of finance, government and military power "grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair."


As if the answer to the attacks should have been food stamps for al-Qaida.


Sen. Obama advised caution and warned of overreacting. "We will have to make sure, despite our rage, that any U.S. military action takes into account the lives of innocent civilians abroad," he wrote. "We will have to be unwavering in opposing bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of Middle Eastern descent."


We should also be just as concerned, he felt, with American anger and bigotry as we were about al-Qaida.


In an opinion piece in Commentary magazine, writer Abe Greenwald commented on Obama's belief that the 9/11 attacks were rooted in poverty and despair. "Strange," he called it, "considering our attackers were wealthy and educated, connected and ecstatic."


As Greenwald put it, Obama "could have asked (terrorist and colleague) Bill Ayers, 'Bill, did your 'failure of empathy' stem from your impoverished upbringing as the son of the CEO of Commonwealth Edison?" Did poverty and despair also cause the Weather Underground member and host of Obama's first fundraiser to bomb government buildings?


Fact is, the roster of terrorists and their handlers reads like a list of of Ivy Leaguers:


Osama bin Laden, the son of a Saudi billionaire, studied engineering. Khalid Sheik Mohammed, architect of 9/11 and other major attacks, has a degree in mechanical engineering. Mohammed Atta, who flew a jet into the World Trade Center, is the son of a lawyer and earned a master's degree in urban planning at Hamburg University. Ayman al-Zawahri is an eye surgeon. Seven doctors were involved in the London-Glasgow bomb plots.


You get the idea, even if Barack Obama doesn't.


In a speech before a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001, President Bush pointed out the real reasons Islamofascists hate us: "They hate what they see right here in this chamber — a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other."


Bush aptly called the 9/11 terrorists and their ilk "the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the 20th century."


"By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions, by abandoning every value except the will to power, they follow in the path of fascism, Nazism and totalitarianism," he said.


Knowing the nature of your enemy is the key to victory. On the seventh anniversary of 9/11, we should all thank President Bush for keeping America safe. Along the way, he brought freedom and democracy to the Middle East, draining the terrorist swamp.


Bush gets it. So does John McCain. This is one thing we shouldn't want to change.


I have no idea how Obama's comments have failed to resonate with the American people. Hopefully, those words will resonate before it's too late.

Credit: Gull

Sunday, September 7, 2008

NoBlahma -- Oh Bama -- n' Obama

Huh?




Go ahead, speak o' toothless wonder ......

.

Monday, January 7, 2008

Mitt Romney: Leadership for Tomorrow --

Today.

Now more than ever.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

The Repub Debate: Piling on Romney

Mitt Romney took the shots they gave him with class and unruffled demeanor. More will come tomorrow night --- be strong and resolved, Mitt.

From Gull:

Make no bones about it. Mitt Romney is facing the battle of his political
life. Not just in New Hampshire. Not just in Iowa. In every
state. In the headlines of newspapers, in the lead stories in alleged
"news" reports and on the Internet via allegedly unbiased bloggers.

With the MSM (including Fox news) portraying Mitt's "comparison" ads as negative -- while ignoring the personal attack ads by the Huckster and John McCain -- it's going to be a fight to the finish. Keep up the campaign, Mitt. America
needs you .....

Read it all.